I'm in the process of developing a cognitive model for my social network based on random sampling. Twitter, for me, is an example of technology moving faster than my intellectual infrastructure. However, after reading a weekend worth of conversation, the following is a personal good beginning.
My Cognitive Model.
- Value added to social network.
- Substantive.
- Quality.
- Relevant.
- Thought evoking.
- Thought leadership.
On Twitter. - "Thanks Mike Arrington for taking us off the rails into Twitter idiot land" Scobleizer (link).
- "HamFeed -- the New Ham Repeater on Twitter" Chris, N7ICE (link)(link).
- "Flitter Flitter, What's the Worth of Twitter?" Steve, K9ZW (link).
- "I don't like you! Really I don't!" Mike, WA4D (link).
I have choices for example, establishing thought leadership based on numbers or creating a value added network of like minded individuals. Certainly, each one of us bring specific criteria as to whom is followed, and that is the point. I value substance, humor, quality, relevancy and thought leadership. My goal is life enriching data.
Perhaps one of the interesting manifestations of Twitter is blow back. Consequently, I submit that one leads Twitter and Twitter does not lead me. Some are saying that 2009 will be the great
defriending year as everyone develops workable cognitive solutions for their networks. My intrinsic value system (eg. substance, quality, relevancy) defines my developing social network. And this system leads to social network categories much like what is available at
FriendFeed.
One can define their social network accordingly.
Twitter & FriendFeed.One might label Twitter as cafeteria and FriendFeed as library. In either case, both serve a purpose as social organizers, depending on one's want or need. Twitter, on the other hand, is getting a lot of buzz much like the buzz at lunch time. And FriendFeed is another building on the same campus. One can choose their destination. The destination does not choose me.
Impact? One gets an overwhelming sense that our community generally scoffs at social networking via Internet. A data point to consider but is not generalizable is "
Horrible Language, Topics & Overall Behavior On HF."
Certainly, we have a host of questions to solve yet, I'm lead to this suggestion made by Dale N. Hatfield, W0IFO in his
AMRAD remarks, "[S]oftware Defined Radios represent a final merger of the radio communications and computer fields. Viewed from that perspective, this technological development even has the potential of attracting back to the hobby some of the people who have shifted their interest to computer technology. Because of this potential to advance the service in fundamental ways, I would urge amateur groups to participate actively in our proceeding."
I'm witness early adoption of Hatfield's suggestion that is, the merger of wireless with computer technology. And I want to emphasize, "
...[E]ven has the potential of attracting back to the hobby some of the people who have shifted their interest to computer technology."
My qualitative observation suggests that operators are constructing antennas, purchasing radios, re-organizing shacks and operating. There exists a renewed sense of spectrum responsibility as we move into the future.
In Sum. I, for one believe that a host of operators are figuring out the meaning of Twitter and FriendFeed. We might say that many of us are early adopters of a new wave of wireless technology that is sight unseen. Wherein, wireless communication and Internet will function in a seamless environment. I'm hedging on Millennials who are networking on Twitter.
In contrast, I'm still working out my cognitive model that defines the meaningfulness of social networking in relationship to ham radio. I'm ultimately interested in substance, quality, and relevancy as networking determinants.
Alas, Dale N. Hatfield, W0IFO concluded in his
AMRAD remarks, "...I believe that the future of the amateur service is a bright one. It is one where technological advances such as Software Defined Radios can enable the ham community to continue its proud tradition of innovation while demonstrating its commitment to the efficient use of the spectrum resource."
73 from the shackadelic.