Katz suggested once a contest starts some things are controllable such as operating time, band, transmitter, antenna direction conversely other elements of the contest are not mainly, propagation (2002). The radiosport athlete uses intuition, skill, and station (e.g. transmitter and antenna) while simultaneously competing against other athletes and nature. Whereas, the activity of radiosport athletics improves one's operating skill, expands one's knowledge base in reference to amateur radio, and defines the character of each respective contest.
According to Katz, an effective radiosport strategy includes planning band changes and/or pointing antennas in the right direction to maximize multipliers and increase one's contact rate (2002). On the other hand, for low-power radiosport athletes, one needs to determine the amount of time spent CQing and how much time to spend in search and pounce (SP) mode. Marc, W6ZZZ suggested choosing one's best band albeit 20, 40, or 80 and SP while making contacts (NS Operating, n.d.). Furthermore, after successfully completing one's first SP QSO follow-up with a CQ then call again for a total of three CQs before switching to SP mode.
Ken, N6RO stated, "...Multiplier strategy is now the name of this game." (NS Operating, para 6). Katz defined a multiplier as a special kind of contact and as a first contact in a contest such as CQ World Wide one can earn 1, 2, or 3 points (2002). An entry-level radiosport athlete running low-power (e.g. 100-watts or less) and low-profile antennas (e.g. dipoles, random wire, verticals, etc.) might focus on multiplier hunting using the SP technique followed by calling CQ. As a personal note this technique proved quite useful during the 2007 running of the ARRL DX International and the majority of contacts throughout the NCCC Sprint series thus far fall into the SP category.
Katz proposed the process of maximizing one's contest score involves the following 1). Making decisions about when to change bands and frequencies, 2). antenna direction and, 3). When to take rest breaks (2002). The character of the NCCC NS Sprint eliminates proposal three leaving one and two as valid considerations. He further suggested an optimal strategy consisting of 1). Maximize the number of contacts and multipliers on respective bands based on experience and, 2). planning and knowledge of propagation (Katz).
One might keep in mind as an entry-level radiosport athlete the suggestions made by Katz (2002) such as when to change bands and frequencies, the character of one's station (e.g. transmitter and antenna), understanding propagation and its influence, and one's level of experience. According to NS Operating (n.d.). the preferred beginner strategy is to determine one's best band and proceed to SP for x amount of time then call CQ. One must discover a comfortable balance between SP and calling CQ.
The purpose of analyzing the NCCC Sprint Grid is to provide a benchmark for radiosport athletes at any level. An entry-level athlete may establish personal scoring goals from the provided averages. Another might compare and contrast results from last week's performance.
Katz stated, "Consciously and subconsciously, each operator creates a personal strategy to optimize his contest performance within the confines of his financial, geographical, physical and technical resource limitations." (2002, p 2)
Analysis of the NCCC Sprint Grid for 2006 and 2007 through week five based on averaging suggested for 2006, a total of 315 submitted logs totalling 237,594 points; average log submission rate (n = 26); points per week equaled 754, as a whole.
(Note: sum of all scores did not include best of 9 score)
East of the Mississippi Division (2006)
Total points = 100,194
Average divisional points/week = 8,350
Average points/week/sprinter = 363 points
Sprinter total: 23
West of the Mississippi Division (2006)
Total points = 77,762
Average divisional points/week = 6,480
Average points/week/sprinter = 282
Sprinter total: 23
NCCC CA/NV Division (2006)
Total points = 48,896
Average divisional points/week = 4,075
Average points/week/sprinter = 291
Sprinter total: 14
(note: divisional averaging based on best of 9 and points rounded up)
In comparison, 126 logs submitted in 2007 as of week 5 totaled 84,826 points with an overall log submission rate (n = 25) and, an average of 673 points per sprinter, as a whole.
Divisionally, the break down is as follows -
East of the Mississippi Division (2007) as of week 5
Total points = 39,573
Average divisional points/week = 7,915
Average points/week/sprinter = 466
Sprinter total: 17
West of the Mississippi Division (2007) as of week 5
Total points = 21,467
Average divisional points/week = 4,293
Average points/week/sprinter = 253
Sprinter total: 17
NCCC CA/NV (2007) as of week 5
Total points = 19,708
Average divisional points/week = 3,942
Average points/week/sprinter = 493
Sprinter total: 8
(note: divisional averaging does not include best of 9)
Solar measurements for weeks 5 and 6 as follows -
Week 5 SFI (68); A (9); K (1)
Week 6 SFI (68); A (6); K (1)
Reference:
Katz, S (2002). A Novel Perspective of Amateur Radio Contesting, pp. 1-16. (p 2)
Northern California Contest Club (n.d.). Operating NS Retrieved on April 24, 2007 from http://www.ncccsprint.com/operating.htm. (para 6)
Northern California Contest Club (n.d.). NS Results 2007 Retrieved on April 23, 2007 from http://www.ncccsprint.com/results.htm.
Northern California Contest Club (n.d.). NS Results 2006 Retrieved on April 23, 2007 from http://www.ncccsprint.com/2006_results.htm.
Propagation (n.d.) Retrieved on April 23, 2007 from http://dx.qsl.net/propagation/index.html.